Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:06:19PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > +int exynos4_cpufreq_lock(unsigned int nId, > > + enum cpufreq_level_request cpufreq_level); > > +void exynos4_cpufreq_lock_free(unsigned int nId); > > This feels like something cpufreq should support to at least some extent > in the core, especially the thing with forcing a particular mode on > suspend. Not that I have any particularly bright ideas for how > immediately. Basically, I agreed, but I also have no idea yet :( How about to use this for now then let us think the way? Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
