Re: [PATCH 1/2] [CPUFREQ] powernow-k8: Don't notify of successful transition if we failed.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > @@ -1112,6 +1114,9 @@ static int transition_frequency_pstate(struct powernow_k8_data *data,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	res = transition_pstate(data, pstate);
> > +	if (res)
> > +		return res;
> 
> That's wrong because transition_pstate() returns 0 unconditionally
> (at least it does so on 3.0-rc3). But this change accidentally fixes
> a different bug because res is used uninitialized, containing stack
> garbage otherwise.
> 
> A proper fix should be to check against data->max_hw_pstate and
> check whether the entry is not CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID (look at
> fill_powernow_table_pstate() for example).

Aha! I can respin a patch for that tomorrow.
> 
> I'm guessing this oops happens when powernow-k8 is loaded in the guest
> and that the actual power management is done in the hypervisor?

Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux