On 06/01/11 02:58, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:55:05PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Instead of samsung tree, it should be handled at cpufreq tree.
CCed the cpufreq maintainer.
Well, it's a something for both really as both trees are updated. I
sent the orginal copy of this patch to both places but both sets of
maintainers just ignored it (I've never seen any response from the
cpufreq maintainers on this driver ever since I originally submitted
it).
Hi Mark,
Sorry for late response.
Basically, you're moving is great to me and will review in 1 day.
As I remember, 800Mhz support on S3C6410 is ok and replied about that.
Then isn't there any progress in my side?...I'm outside of my office.
At the minute I'm mostly just trying to get some of the backlog of
S3C64xx patches I'm accumilating out of my queue :(
Dave, I'd like to talk about moving Samsung cpufreq drivers. I sent
about Kconfig.arm. If you're ok, will submit remained one to move
all of Samsung cpufreq drivers. And if possible would be better to me,
if someone(you or me) could make some branch to merge into both.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
