On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:58:11AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:55:05PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > > > Instead of samsung tree, it should be handled at cpufreq tree. > > CCed the cpufreq maintainer. > > Well, it's a something for both really as both trees are updated. I > sent the orginal copy of this patch to both places but both sets of > maintainers just ignored it (I've never seen any response from the > cpufreq maintainers on this driver ever since I originally submitted > it). Sorry about that. It's actually in my 'to merge' mailbox, but I've been laggy at dealing with it recently. I'll try and clear the backlog in the next day or two. thanks, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
