On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > Indeed. So in my opinion it makes sense to move code into the drivers > > > directory, at least the code that's going to be used by multiple platforms > > > (that need not be a complete driver). > > > > Ok, so my opinion on this has changed a little over the weekend. > > I don't totally hate it now, but I'm still not a huge fan. > > That said, I won't stand in the way if this is what everyone agrees is > > the way forward. > > > > in cpufreq.next I moved the x86 drivers over. Someone look it over ? > > If that looks like what you all had in mind, start sending me the patches > > for other arches, and I'll get them queued up for .40 > > FYI, this is now on the 'move-drivers' branch in cpufreq.git > Unless there's a good reason not to, I'm going to start pushing this to Linus > next merge window. Thanks. Additional drivers should follow suit. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
