Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: use dynamic debug instead of custom infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:43:02PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
 > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:28:20PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
 > >  > ping... any chance to get this and the second patch into 2.6.40?
 > >  
 > > This looks like it needs a bit more work..
 > 
 > Argh, some debug messages and formatting obviously were broken. Could you
 > apply this patch on top, or squash it with the other patches if you prefer
 > that? Thanks & best,

I had to squash all three diffs together, as there were compile failures
introduced when applying just the first, with or without this third patch.

It's all pushed out now, and seems to be holding together.
Haven't boot tested it at all yet.

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux