* Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> [110421 13:59]: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 05:05:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > This is why I don't believe that moving this code from arch/ to drivers/ > > will change anything. > > That at least would have the property of gathering drivers together > according to their _purpose_, irrespective of their implementation > details. That's the case for all the other class of drivers already. > Why would cpufreq drivers be different? And drivers do have well defined standards, so that automatically prevents people sneaking in spaghetti calls to platform specific code ;) Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
