Re: [PATCH 0/6] Do not use sysdevs for implementing "core" PM operations on x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, March 22, 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > If there are no objectsions, I'd like to push these patches through the suspend
> > > tree.
> > 
> > [1/8] has been merged in the meantime and [3/8] has been included into the
> > ACPI tree.  if there are no objections, I'm going to push the following
> > patches to Linus this week through the suspend-2.6 tree:
> > 
> > [1/6] - Convert sysdev users in arch/x86 to using struct syscore_ops.
> > 
> > [2/6] - Make timekeeping use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> >  
> > [3/6] - Make Intel IOMMU use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> > 
> > [4/6] - Make KVM use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> > 
> > [5/6] - Make cpufreq use struct syscore_ops for boot CPU suspend/resume.
> > 
> > [6/6] - Introduce config switch allowing architectures to skip sysdev
> >         suspend/resume/shutdown code.
> 
> The x86 bits look fine.
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> The patches affect a lot of hardware so please make sure they are tested well 
> before pushing them to Linus :-)

I have tested the majority, but unfortunately I have no hardware to test
the Intel IOMMU patch on it.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux