From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> None of the existing cpufreq drivers uses the second argument of its .suspend() callback (which isn't useful anyway), so remove it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> --- Hi, This patch is requisite for sysdevs rework discussed here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/9/439 Please apply or let me know if I can take it to the suspend tree. Thanks, Rafael --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c | 3 +-- arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c | 3 +-- arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/cpu-freq.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 +- 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/cpufreq.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver { int (*bios_limit) (int cpu, unsigned int *limit); int (*exit) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy); - int (*suspend) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, pm_message_t pmsg); + int (*suspend) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy); int (*resume) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy); struct freq_attr **attr; }; Index: linux-2.6/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ static int cpufreq_suspend(struct sys_de goto out; if (cpufreq_driver->suspend) { - ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(cpu_policy, pmsg); + ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(cpu_policy); if (ret) printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: suspend failed in ->suspend " "step on CPU %u\n", cpu_policy->cpu); Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static u32 read_gpio(struct device_node return offset; } -static int pmac_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, pm_message_t pmsg) +static int pmac_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { /* Ok, this could be made a bit smarter, but let's be robust for now. We * always force a speed change to high speed before sleep, to make sure Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpufreq.c @@ -390,8 +390,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq } #ifdef CONFIG_PM -static int s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - pm_message_t pmsg) +static int s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return 0; } Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpufreq.c @@ -458,8 +458,7 @@ static int s5pv310_target(struct cpufreq } #ifdef CONFIG_PM -static int s5pv310_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - pm_message_t pmsg) +static int s5pv310_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { return 0; } Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/cpu-freq.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/cpu-freq.c +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/cpu-freq.c @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static int s3c_cpufreq_verify(struct cpu static struct cpufreq_frequency_table suspend_pll; static unsigned int suspend_freq; -static int s3c_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, pm_message_t pmsg) +static int s3c_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { suspend_pll.frequency = clk_get_rate(_clk_mpll); suspend_pll.index = __raw_readl(S3C2410_MPLLCON); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html