https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29522 --- Comment #1 from RogÃrio Brito <rbrito@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-20 10:48:12 --- Hi there. Just as an extra data point, with the patch that I sent in the earlier package, I can indeed (as expected) set lower frequencies with ondemand (that is, *it* sets the frequency dynamically). One benefit of this is that, when my computer is left idle, it does not heat as much as it used to, but I fear that there is no voltage being decreased, and, therefore, no power economy. Is that right? How should one implement it "the right way"? I just know some C, but I don't know how program physical devices. I can, OTOH, test as many patches as you'd like me to. Thanks in advance for any help, RogÃrio Brito. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
