> Interesting approach, but seems to be quite different from what "ondemand" > does at the moment. And, as David Niemi pointed out, it seems to be more > Intel-specific. Therefore, what do you think about adding this different > algorithm as a different governor, and keep the "ondemand" algorithm more or > less as it is? Good suggestion! I will write a different governor soon if nobody oppose. Thanks -Youquan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
