https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24562 Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED CC| |trenn@xxxxxxx Resolution| |CODE_FIX AssignedTo|cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |trenn@xxxxxxx --- Comment #12 from Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> 2010-12-14 11:26:22 --- > This is confusing, this can be read as: core 0, currently on 3200 MHz, core 1 > currently on 2400 MHz, etc, with cores 4 and 5 not seen. I expect you mean the new message on "boostable" CPUs which is unrelated to the rest: > powernow-k8: Core Performance Boosting: on. can get mixed up with below: > powernow-k8: 0 : pstate 0 (3200 MHz) > powernow-k8: 1 : pstate 1 (2400 MHz) especially the "Core performance" string by bad luck looks related: Core Performance 0 : pstate 0 1 : pstate 1 I agree that this is a bit confusing and Rui's first part of the patch should be sufficient: if (cpu_family == CPU_HW_PSTATE) { printk(KERN_INFO PFX - " %d : pstate %d (%d MHz)\n", j, + " pstate %d (%d MHz)\n", data->powernow_table[j].index, data->powernow_table[j].frequency/1000); In the other case this message: > powernow-k8: Core Performance Boosting: on. doesn't appear anyway and the message has another format and the bit removed by Rui has some meaning. But this is a really minor bug. I hope I do not forget about it and I will add Rui's first part if I have other cpufreq patches in the queue -> I set this one resolved already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
