Re: [Bug #16169] Complain from preemptive debug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael,

Andrew answered in [1]:

"I just merged a different patch whcih should address this:
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>"

This alternative patch is fixing the problem here, too.

Kind Regards,
- Sedat -

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106555/


On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169
> Subject         : Complain from preemptive debug
> Submitter       : Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date            : 2010-05-31 10:10 (21 days old)
> Message-ID      : <AANLkTilTnAAZIizKinYsxFkNTkrmPqk6XJJuUjjhJ7EP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77
> Handled-By      : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Patch           : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux