Re: [PATCH 8/7] cpufreq: make the iowait-is-busy-time a sysfs tunable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:48:18PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: make the iowait-is-busy-time a sysfs tunable
> 
> Pavel Machek pointed out that not all CPUs have an efficient idle
> at high frequency. Specifically, older Intel and various AMD cpus
> would get a higher power usage when copying files from USB.
> 
> Mike Chan pointed out that the same is true for various ARM chips
> as well.
> 
> Thomas Renninger suggested to make this a sysfs tunable with a
> reasonable default.
> 
> This patch adds a sysfs tunable for the new behavior, and uses
> a very simple function to determine a reasonable default, depending
> on the CPU vendor/type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

That's very nice Arjan. That way we'll be able to select between
performance and power savings, which is what most laptop users
want after all !

Thanks,
Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux