From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 01:33:19PM +0200 > > -static int has_mperf_aperf_support(int cpu) > > +static int cpu_has_effective_freq() > You changed the func here, but not the caller. > You fix this in the next patch, but it will result > in a compile error with only this patch applied. > I doubt someone will bisect cpufrequtils, but still... Haa, this is because I thought it'd be smart to split the patch. I'll fix it, thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating Systems Research Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
