On Monday 22 March 2010 19:38:37 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@xxxxxxx>
>
> Multiple modules used to define those which are with identical
> functionality and were needlessly replicated among the different cpufreq
> drivers. Push them into the header and remove duplication.
>
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 4de02b1..c8d731c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -278,6 +278,27 @@ struct freq_attr {
> ssize_t (*store)(struct cpufreq_policy *, const char *, size_t count);
> };
...
>
> +#define define_one_global_ro(_name) \
> +static struct global_attr _name = \
> +__ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
> +
> +#define define_one_global_rw(_name) \
> +static struct global_attr _name = \
> +__ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
These sound like too general names in global space.
And are unrelated to cpufreq(.h).
Eventually you get them into sysfs.h with another name
or just duplicate them?
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
