Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 17:42 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven: > On 3/20/2010 14:37, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > It also seem to be (hopefully) a minor feature for timechart, so this should > > not hurt that much (yet). > > It's actually a major feature for timechart, and one of the key things I and a bunch of others > inside Intel use timechart for. > It's a major feature for us too. I suppose, the cpufreq_notify_transition calls are correct (meaning being called for all related cpus) for every driver. So there's still the option to include it in the POST_CHANGE section of this function. Could this be okay for the both of you? -- Robert Schoene Technische Universitaet Dresden Zentrum fuer Informationsdienste und Hochleistungsrechnen 01062 Dresden Tel.: (0351) 463-42483, Fax: (0351) 463-37773 E-Mail: Robert.Schoene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
