On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:28:14 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 05:25:38PM +0200, Krzysztof Helt wrote: > > From: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@xxxxx> > > > > There is a typo in the longhaul detection code so only Longhaul v1 or Longhaul v3 > > is selected. The Longhaul v2 is not selected even for CPUs which are capable of. > > > > Tested on PCChips Giga Pro board. Frequency changes work and the Longhaul v2 > > detects that the board is not capable of changing CPU voltage. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@xxxxx> > > It seems we deliberately changed this two years ago, though the changelog > is a bit sparse on details.. > > commit 07844252ffd81ec192a62014bada1016c9703765 > Author: Rafal Bilski <rafalbilski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun Apr 22 12:26:04 2007 +0200 > > [CPUFREQ] Longhaul - Revert Longhaul ver. 2 > > There is something wrong with this code. It needs more > testing. It is better to disable it for now because support > for some machines will be broken. > > Signed-off-by: Rafal Bilski <rafalbilski@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Are there any chances this patch will go into the linux-next? Regards, Krzysztof ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Strrraszny konkurs z Scooby-Doo! Wez udzial >> http://link.interia.pl/f2412 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
