Hey, both patches look good, so: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 02:18:21PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Subject: speedstep-ich: fix error caused by 394122ab144dae4b276d74644a2f11c44a60ac5c > > "[CPUFREQ] cpumask: avoid playing with cpus_allowed in speedstep-ich.c" > changed the code to mistakenly pass the current cpu as the "processor" > argument of speedstep_get_frequency(), whereas it should be the type of > the processor. > > (Based on patch by dave.mueller@xxxxxx, compile-tested only) > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 03:33:16PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > The "unsigned int processor" everywhere confused Rusty, leading to > breakage when he passed in smp_processor_id(). > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Best, Dominik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
