On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 11:19 +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> You still use struct perf_pair split/hi/lo members in #ifdef __i386__
> case which you deleted above.
> > shift_count = fls(h);
> >
> > - cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
> > - cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
> > + cur.aperf >>= shift_count;
> > + cur.mperf >>= shift_count;
> > }
> >
> > if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
> Same here, possibly still elsewhere.
> Is this only x86_64 compile tested?
Of course, who still has 32bit only hardware anyway ;-)
Will fix, thanks for spotting that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
