* Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:mingo@xxxxxxx] > >Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:14 PM > >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh > >Cc: Thomas Renninger; Dave Jones; Rusty Russell; Linus > >Torvalds; Yinghai Lu; Avi Kivity; Andrew Morton; Thomas > >Gleixner; H. Peter Anvin; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx > >Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: remove dbs_mutex > > > > > >* Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Mathieu Desnoyers sent a patch earlier that should address > >this problem. > >> > >> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.1/00331.html > > > >No, that patch has _not_ fixed the regression: > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/8/563 > > > > The subsequent failure that Dave saw after that patch seemed to be > related to dbs_mutex > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/11/6 > > That should be be fixed by your original patch. And how well will the two mix? This should really be pursued by the cpufreq people i think ... Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
