On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:43:27 pm Yinghai Lu wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:23:52 am Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> so later could use nr_cpumask_bits in cpumask_size when MAXSMP is used > > > > I have a (more ambitious) patch for this in my queue, which weans it off > > this entirely: > > > > Subject: cpumask: avoid playing with cpus_allowed in powernow-k8.c ... > will be in .31? Hope so, it's been in linux-next for ages. The cpufreq maintainers seem to take a relaxed approach to patches, FWIW. Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
