Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/cpufreq: use cpumask_copy instead of =

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> work_on_cpu()'s definition could probably use a fat comment describing
> why it sucks.

No, it should be renamed.

The problem is that it _sounds_ like a nice thing to do.

If it was called "slow_other_cpu_thread_switch_with_a_donkey_on_top()", I 
bet people wouldn't be so damn eager to use it.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux