Re: [BUG]cpufreq_ondemand: a recent regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:

 > Locking in cpufreq subsystem always is/was a nightmare.
 > I brought this up already and there were not much objections:
 > 
 > Can we reduce complexity and disallow different governors on different
 > cores?

I think this is the way forward.  It's hard to think of a use-case
where this is a useful feature.
Though we'd still have to go through the usual feature-removal process.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux