* Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@xxxxxxx) wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13186 > Subject : cpufreq timer teardown problem > Submitter : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2009-04-23 14:00 (24 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124049523515036&w=4 > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/19754/ > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/19753/ > (re-send with updated changelog) cpufreq fix timer teardown in conservative governor The problem is that dbs_timer_exit() uses cancel_delayed_work() when it should use cancel_delayed_work_sync(). cancel_delayed_work() does not wait for the workqueue handler to exit. The ondemand governor does not seem to be affected because the "if (!dbs_info->enable)" check at the beginning of the workqueue handler returns immediately without rescheduling the work. The conservative governor in 2.6.30-rc has the same check as the ondemand governor, which makes things usually run smoothly. However, if the governor is quickly stopped and then started, this could lead to the following race : dbs_enable could be reenabled and multiple do_dbs_timer handlers would run. This is why a synchronized teardown is required. Depends on patch cpufreq: remove rwsem lock from CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP call The following patch applies to 2.6.30-rc2. Stable kernels have a similar issue which should also be fixed, but the code changed between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, so this patch only applies to 2.6.30-rc. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: gregkh@xxxxxxx CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxx CC: cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> CC: rjw@xxxxxxx CC: Ben Slusky <sluskyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c 2009-04-23 23:22:15.000000000 -0400 +++ linux-2.6-lttng/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c 2009-04-23 23:24:38.000000000 -0400 @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* numbe * (like __cpufreq_driver_target()) is being called with dbs_mutex taken, then * cpu_hotplug lock should be taken before that. Note that cpu_hotplug lock * is recursive for the same process. -Venki + * DEADLOCK ALERT! (2) : do_dbs_timer() must not take the dbs_mutex, because it + * would deadlock with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), which is needed for proper + * raceless workqueue teardown. */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(dbs_mutex); @@ -542,7 +545,7 @@ static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct static inline void dbs_timer_exit(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info) { dbs_info->enable = 0; - cancel_delayed_work(&dbs_info->work); + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dbs_info->work); } static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
