Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 20 April 2009 12:45:29 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Monday 20 April 2009 07:13:51 Len Brown wrote:
> > > FYI,
> > > Thanks to Ebay, I now have a T60:-)
> > Hmm, Lenovo sold a lot different machines as T60.
> > I found an acpidump of a T60 here without any _PPC function
> > at all.
> > 
> > > and so i put the DSDT here:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13139
> > > 
> > > I'll poke at this in more detail soon...
> > Ingo, can you place yours somewhere too, please.
> > This one should be taken into account for _PPC code changes
> > as it seem to implement some corner case.
> 
> Sure, find it attached below.
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> DSDT @ 0x7f6e65e7
>   0000: 44 53 44 54 65 c7 00 00 01 49 4c 45 4e 4f 56 4f  
...
Ingo, did you do a BIOS update in between?
The DSDT and SSDTs you added do not contain a _PPC function.
These ACPI tables definitely do not suffer from an initial _PPC
evaluation.

    Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux