http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12826 ------- Comment #15 from anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2009-03-06 20:46 ------- Reply-To: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 04:38:57 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:27:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 03:45:12 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The low-level cpufreq drivers have no idea whether a speed request > > > originated from userspace or the kernel, so we'd need to either special > > > case p4-clockmod in the core or add an argument that everything other > > > than p4-clockmod ignores. Or we could figure out why this computer > > > overheats and fix that bug. > > > > Please stop deleting and then ignoring everything I say. > > > > The ONLY way of fully repairing this regression is to restore the sysfs > > files, and their 2.6.28 functionality. > > Resulting in computers that run slower and consume more power. "My > script that does something stupid now gives an error" isn't a > regression. "My computer now overheats" is a bug that was being hidden > in the first place. Why don't we just fix that bug? Do the thing which I suggested, and which you deleted without comment. Or something else! Just don't break existing userspace code, and people's computers. I'm sure you can manage this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
