On Friday 06 March 2009 16:51:49 Roland Dreier wrote: > > Nb: Matthew Garrett submitted a similar-but-different patch a week or > > two ago on the cpufreq list that demoted the message to KERN_INFO. > > Sorry, missed that. I considered the demotion to KERN_INFO but a) no > other cpufreq drivers seem to print anything if the device isn't found > and b) I can't imagine a realistic case of when the message would *ever* > be useful. Good points. I wasn't favoring one or the other 'til now, but simply returning -ENODEV does indeed seem to be more in line with what other freq scaling drivers do. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
