On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:54:06 pm Alan Jenkins wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > * Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:31:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> > Nice fix! Where does this information come from? Distro module
> >> > ordering magic? It's rather non-trivial.
> >>
> >> Pretty much. p4-clockmod is never the preferred option because
> >> it does no voltage scaling. speedstep-centrino is now almost
> >> entirely functionally replaced with acpi-cpufreq. The
> >> powernow-k8 issue was a personal communication from davej.
> >
> > I'm wondering whether that priority order should/could be
> > expressed in the module space too - so that distros wouldnt have
> > to replicate this. This is really a piece of information the
> > kernel is best at maintaining.
>
> The latest development version of module-init-tools (in the git tree)
> is designed to preserve the kernel link order when resolving builtin
> aliases. If you have two modules which provide the alias "pci:123",
> they will be loaded in the same order as if they were builtin drivers.
>
> It should work if all the cpufreq drivers provide an alias
> "cpufreq-driver" and userspace just does "modprobe cpufreq-driver".
> You just need to be sure none of the cpufreq drivers provide *other*
> aliases which cause them to be loaded earlier, by udev or some other
> bootscript.
I wonder whether a "cpu:vendor:fam:model:flags:..." alias makes sense.
This would solve autoloading of most cpufreq drivers, but it never looked
important enough.
Other drivers that could make use of this:
- k8temp/k10temp (Don't know about this one, but AFAIK there exists an
MSR to read out temperature on latest AMD for which a hwmon driver
is/should be written)?
- Microcode update?
- more?
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
