On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 17:36 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:29:52PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > In fact, we've noticed severe regressions with p4-clockmod over simply > > having no scaling driver at all - and are not going to built it into our > > kernels. > > It makes sense to have p4-clockmod from a thermal management > perspective. We should probably bump its transition latency to more than > 10ms to prevent ondemand binding to it. > If that's possible; that'd be good. The trouble with it is that it never seems to bring the CPU anywhere near maximum performance. Scott -- Scott James Remnant scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
