* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well it turns out that I was having a less-than-usually-senile moment: > > : implement flush_work() > Why isn't that working in this case?? how would that work in this case? We defer processing into the workqueue exactly because we want its per-CPU properties. We want work_on_cpu() to be done in the workqueue context on the CPUs that were specified, not in the local CPU context. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
