* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi Ingo, > >> > >> If you are ready for these, I've pushed them to the cpus4096-for-ingo > >> tree. (Note it's been renamed.) > > > > that might be fine for v2.6.30, but we need separate patches in a > > separate branch, for all -git relevant fixes - in as safe way as > > possible. > > > > Ingo > > So you want me to create a separate branch for each patch? > > And don't you think the fix to work_on_cpu should be put into 2.6.29? Getting it into v2.6.29 is precisely the point: please put the essential fixes (and only the fixes) into a separate (single), -git based (i.e. not tip/cpus4096 based) branch that i can pull. The work_on_cpu() commit(s) would be part of that branch. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html