http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11296 ------- Comment #9 from rjw@xxxxxxx 2008-08-22 11:21 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > No, it's SLAB. > > I'll see what I can do split the patch. It won't be very useful that way, but > I could create a bunch of unused per-cpu variables. Well, if they are unused, we won't be able to check if per-CPU memory is corrupted. In fact, I don't see anything other than some corruption of per-CPU memory that could result from this patch and lead to slab corruption. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
