http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11296 ------- Comment #7 from rjw@xxxxxxx 2008-08-22 09:26 ------- Well, no, it doesn't really. Is that with SLUB or SLAB? If this is with SLUB, then corrupting per-CPU memory could lead to that. Would it be practicable to split the patch reverted by commit f607e3a03c90e8c050cb0c12ec9967c2925cc812 into two patches, one introducing the per-CPU variables and the other one actually causing them to be passed to acpi_processor_preregister_performance() ? Then, we could verify which part of the original patch causes the problem to happen. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
