Hi All, I thank for release of corosync2.3.5. We used the "rrp_mode:active" setting so far. The "rrp_mode: active" did not seem to be recommended when I saw release note of corosync2.3.5. What is the cause that was not recommended from this time? In addition, is there a point to be careful about when we continue using "ative"? * We want to know a problem and the influence that were not recommended in detail. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
