Re: memory leak -- a bad one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Otheus,

otheus uibk napsal(a):
Here is a top-except from corosync 2.3.4 running for under 15 hours:

   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
15406 root      20   0 10.5g 9.2g 9168 S  2.0 58.8  11:50.07 corosync

(I'm using fixed-width font in gmail;I have no idea what happens to this
text when going via pipermail)

It's showing a RES usage of 9.2 GB. This high memory usage is after a
relatively minor configuration change -- moving the listed nodes from
totem.interface.member{ } to  nodelist.node { }. Two nodes were also added.
AFAIK this was the only change.

This look like a serious issue. Are you able to reproduce it? What version of libqb are you using?

Regards,
  Honza


A review of changes since 2.3.4 indicates this has not been fixed since
that release.




_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux