On 10/02/2014 10:53 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Jan Friesse <jfriesse@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> MTU for IPv6 is 20 bytes larger then IPv4. This fact was not taken into >> account so IPv6 packets were larger then MTU resulting in fragmentation. >> >> Solution is to substract correct IP header size. > > I have no idea about this business, but won't optional extension headers > occasionally throw off these calculations, potentially causing problems? > It shouldn't be a problem as we don't request any IPv6 special options on the socket and all Path MTU calculation algorithm I have seen around don't check for those ones and still hit the right values. Fabio _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
