This is a silly thing that's bugged me for a while. corosync-quorumtool
always prints nodes out in IP address order which is not necessarily
node ID order. This can make the output confusing.
This patch forces node ID order. I'm also considering making sort order
a command-line option with selections for IP address, node ID and name.
Thoughts?
Signed-Off-By: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/tools/corosync-quorumtool.c b/tools/corosync-quorumtool.c
index 11124b3..a6d6e4a 100644
--- a/tools/corosync-quorumtool.c
+++ b/tools/corosync-quorumtool.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <config.h>
#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
@@ -368,6 +369,20 @@ static void print_uint32_padded(uint32_t value)
print_string_padded(buf);
}
+static int compare_nodeids(const void *one, const void *two)
+{
+ const struct votequorum_info *info1 = one;
+ const struct votequorum_info *info2 = two;
+
+ if (info1->node_id == info2->node_id) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (info1->node_id > info2->node_id) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return -1;
+}
+
static void display_nodes_data(nodeid_format_t nodeid_format, name_format_t name_format)
{
int i, display_qdevice = 0;
@@ -399,11 +414,12 @@ static void display_nodes_data(nodeid_format_t nodeid_format, name_format_t name
}
printf("Name\n");
+ qsort(info, g_view_list_entries, sizeof(struct votequorum_info), compare_nodeids);
for (i=0; i < g_view_list_entries; i++) {
if (nodeid_format == NODEID_FORMAT_DECIMAL) {
- print_uint32_padded(g_view_list[i]);
+ print_uint32_padded(info[i].node_id);
} else {
- printf("0x%08x ", g_view_list[i]);
+ printf("0x%08x ", info[i].node_id);
}
if (v_handle) {
int votes = -1;
@@ -426,8 +442,8 @@ static void display_nodes_data(nodeid_format_t nodeid_format, name_format_t name
}
}
}
- printf("%s", node_name(g_view_list[i], name_format));
- if (g_view_list[i] == our_nodeid) {
+ printf("%s", node_name(info[i].node_id, name_format));
+ if (info[i].node_id == our_nodeid) {
printf(" (local)");
}
printf("\n");
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss