Hello Steven,
My setup
10.10.10.1 primary server -----EoIP tunnel vpn ipsec ----- dr server 10.10.10.2
On both servers is 2 interfaces eth0 which default gw out and eth1 where corosync live.
Iptables:
-A INPUT -i eth1 -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 5404:5407
-A INPUT -i eth1 -m pkttype --pkt-type multicast
-A INPUT -i eth1 -p igmp
Corosync.conf
totem {
version: 2
token: 160
token_retransmits_before_loss_const: 3
join: 250
consensus: 300
vsftype: none
max_messages: 20
threads: 0
nodeid: 2
rrp_mode: active
interface {
ringnumber: 0
bindnetaddr: 10.10.10.0
mcastaddr: 226.94.1.1
mcastport: 5405
}
}
version: 2
token: 160
token_retransmits_before_loss_const: 3
join: 250
consensus: 300
vsftype: none
max_messages: 20
threads: 0
nodeid: 2
rrp_mode: active
interface {
ringnumber: 0
bindnetaddr: 10.10.10.0
mcastaddr: 226.94.1.1
mcastport: 5405
}
}
Join message
[root@eusipgw01 ~]# corosync-objctl | grep member
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.2.ip=r(0) ip(10.10.10.2)
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.2.join_count=1
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.2.status=joined
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.1.ip=r(0) ip(10.10.10.1)
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.1.join_count=254
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.1.status=joined
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.2.ip=r(0) ip(10.10.10.2)
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.2.join_count=1
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.2.status=joined
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.1.ip=r(0) ip(10.10.10.1)
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.1.join_count=254
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.1.status=joined
Is it possible that ping sends out of wrong interface ?
Slava.
From: "Steven Dake" <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 6:01:11 AM
Subject: Re: [corosync] information request
This can occur because:
a) firewall is enabled - there should be something in the logs telling you to properly configure the firewall
b) a config change is in progress - this is a normal response, and you should try the request again
c) a bug in the synchronization code is resulting in a blocked unsynced cluster
c is very unlikely at this point.
2 ethernet interfaces = rrp mode, bonding, or something else?
Digimer needs moar infos :)
Regards
-steve
To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 6:01:11 AM
Subject: Re: [corosync] information request
On 11/23/2013 12:29 AM, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Everyone,Corosync run on box with 2 Ethernet interfaces.I am getting this messageCPG mcast failed (6)Any information thank you in advance.
This can occur because:
a) firewall is enabled - there should be something in the logs telling you to properly configure the firewall
b) a config change is in progress - this is a normal response, and you should try the request again
c) a bug in the synchronization code is resulting in a blocked unsynced cluster
c is very unlikely at this point.
2 ethernet interfaces = rrp mode, bonding, or something else?
Digimer needs moar infos :)
Regards
-steve
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss