Andrew, please make really sure that mcast works. You can use for example omping for that. What seems to be strange is especially node A. If you compare your node A output: > 10:33:57.364852 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:57.599081 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 with node B output: > 10:33:57.612370 IP 10.40.129.210.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 112 > 10:33:57.612473 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 you can see node B sees both 10.40.129.210.5464 and 10.40.129.209.5464, but node A sees only 10.40.129.209.5464. You can also try to turn on debugging (logging debug: on in config file) and see logs. Regards, Honza and k napsal(a): > Hi everybody, > > I've got a problem with join two nodes with corosync when using multicast. > > I've got 2 nodes: > > A:10.40.129.209 > B:10.40.129.210 > > interface in corosync.conf > > interface { > # The following values need to be set based on your > environment > ringnumber: 0 > bindnetaddr: 10.40.128.0 > mcastaddr: 224.0.0.187 > mcastport: 5465 > } > > > Here is tcpdump on node A. > > At first corosync is up on node A, I see it sends messages to multicast: > > 10:33:55.724608 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:55.958984 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:56.193231 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:56.427601 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:56.661914 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:56.896153 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:57.130481 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:57.364852 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:57.599081 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > > Now I stared corosync on instance B > > 10:33:57.612370 IP 10.40.129.210.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 112 > 10:33:57.612473 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:57.681781 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:57.750903 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:57.820029 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:57.823920 IP 10.40.129.210.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:57.890109 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:57.959233 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.028354 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.058154 IP 10.40.129.210.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:58.098350 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.167477 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.236598 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.292490 IP 10.40.129.210.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:58.306685 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.375919 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.445041 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.514163 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.526730 IP 10.40.129.210.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 82 > 10:33:58.583924 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.653048 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.666071 IP 10.40.129.210.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 38 > 10:33:58.722251 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.791379 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > 10:33:58.860500 IP 10.40.129.209.5464 > 224.0.0.187.5465: UDP, length 156 > > As you can see mutlicast traffic is visible on both nodes, but cluster wont > to join, it keep sending packet of length 82 and 156 continously. > > > Any idea how can I debug this strange situation ? In logs there is no any > errors, it seem that nodes doesnt see each other, but multicast traffic is > visible on both. > > What is more, as you can see above, when i run second instance corosync on > node B, node A see it because it send diffrent mesage of length 156 b. > > Any help ? > > Thank in advance > Andrew > > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss