Re: why remove lcr from corosync release 2.0.x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

2012/6/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Please keep your replies on the mailing list.

On 6/6/2012 9:47 AM, george wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2012/6/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>     On 6/6/2012 9:08 AM, george wrote:
>
>     >
>     > Also pacemaker v1.6.x and cman v3 will use lcr lib in corosync, so
>     does
>     > it mean pcmk v1.6.x and cman v3 can’t use the newest corosync?
>
>     corosync 2.0 has votequorum (see man pages) that obsoleted cman in the
>     2.0 serie. You will need pcmk 1.1.7 or higher to work with that.
>
> 1、Does that mean LCR lib will be permanently deleted from corosync 2.0 ?

It has been removed permanently already.

>
> 2、corosync 2.0 could only be worked with pcmk 1.1.7 or higher, and
> can't work with cman ?

Yes that is correct. cman has been replaced by votequorum. cman will
only work with corosync 1.4.x (or higher) for several years to come.

 How does pcmk use the votequorum service, I can't find any votequorum interface 
call in pcmk source code.
Fabio

>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Qiu Zhigang
>
>     Fabio
>     _______________________________________________
>     discuss mailing list
>     discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>




--
三尺男儿,两柄须眉,一腔热血。夜里三更眠,梦醒五更天。悬梁刺骨多磨砺,争朝夕,扬眉吐气。豪情溢满杯。
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux