On 6/5/2012 10:05 PM, Ted Ross wrote: > I see that many of the definitions in corosync/cpg.h have changed since > version 1.x. Is there any documented guidance as to how a user of > corosync should most properly migrate to version 2.0, or more > specifically, how to conditionally use either 1.x or 2.0? > > I apologize if this is a duplicate question. I did a quick search of > the website and the email archives before asking. > > Thanks, All the CPG_ definitions in 1.x were aliases to CS_ (similar to cpg_error_t vs cs_error_t). It is safe to switch to the standard CS_ as they work exactly the same in 1.x and 2.x Fabio _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
