Re: Poor ZC performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/15/2012 11:47 PM, Voznesensky Vladimir wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I'm doing corosync 2.0.0 cpgbench and cpgbenchzc tests on a single node.
> What do I see:
> cpgbench
> 624586 messages received  8000 bytes per write  10.000 Seconds runtime
> 62458.638 TP/s 499.669 MB/s.
> cpgbenchzc
> 434134 messages received  8000 bytes per write  10.000 Seconds runtime
> 43413.357 TP/s 347.307 MB/s.
> 
> Zero-copy code gives worse performance than non-zc one. How could it be?
> 

We had planned to deprecate the zero copy api since the regular API is
about 15x more performant in 2.0.

Regards
-steve

> Thanks.
> 
> - VV
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux