Please keep the replies on the mail list so others can participate as well. On 5/15/2012 9:42 AM, Voznesensky Vladimir wrote: > On 15.05.2012 11:26, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >> On 5/15/2012 7:24 AM, Voznesensky Vladimir wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> How to avoid split-brain of cluster software pieces in the lack of >>> plugins? >>> Maybe, how to configure cluster engines (pacemaker, gfs2, etc.) to use a >>> single source of quorum? >> You can use votequorum. man votequorum.5 >> > If I understood correct, this fine manpage describes one instance of > coresync per physical node architecture. one node, one corosync instance. > How could I use the same quorum machinery for pacemaker and my own > application? Is it wise at all? pacemaker (1.1.7 or higher) already use votequorum/quorum from corosync. If you write your own application, then look into quorum_overview.8 and quorum_*.3 man pages for description of the client side and library API. Fabio _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
