Re: corosync udpu mystery ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Steven -

Thanks for the response.   These are definitely not unix domain sockets:

udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:60174               0.0.0.0:*                               16198/corosync
udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:49193               0.0.0.0:*                               16198/corosync
udp        0      0 192.168.40.19:694           0.0.0.0:*                               16198/corosync
udp        0      0 192.168.10.19:694           0.0.0.0:*                               16198/corosync
udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:34366               0.0.0.0:*                               16198/corosync
udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:35409               0.0.0.0:*                               16198/corosync

Here is the related  corosync config section:

interface {
        member {
                memberaddr: 192.168.10.20
        }
        member {
                memberaddr: 192.168.10.19
        }
        ringnumber: 0
        bindnetaddr: 192.168.10.0
        mcastport: 694
        ttl: 1
}
interface {
        member {
                memberaddr: 192.168.40.220
        }
        member {
                memberaddr: 192.168.40.19
        }
        ringnumber: 1
        bindnetaddr: 192.168.40.0
        mcastport: 694
        ttl: 1
}
transport: udpu
rrp_mode: passive


-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Dake [mailto:sdake@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:22 AM
To: Bryan Bartone
Cc: discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  corosync udpu mystery ports

On 05/01/2012 08:10 AM, Bryan Bartone wrote:
> First, thanks for taking the time to read this email.  I am using 
> corosync and pacemaker on a security appliance we manufacture.  I am 
> running udpu mode.  I see that for each interface I define, there is a 
> udp listening socket using the mcastport I defined in corosync.conf 
> and two other ephemeral listening ports.  The mcastaddr port is bound 
> to the interface I defined in corosync.conf.  The ephemeral ports are bound to
> all interfaces.   I would like to know what the purpose of those ports
> are, and why they are bound to 0.0.0.0.  Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Probably a bug (udpu is a new feature).  There should be one port for incoming packets and one port for outgoing packets, all bound to the proper interface.  One of the listening ports may be a unix domain socke (used to setup shared memory ipc)t, are you sure that isn't the case?
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux