On 3/7/2012 11:44 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Fabio, > my call there is give it a proper test and commit, because these all > compatibility things are meaningless anyway, unused, untested, > unmaintained, ..., and it's better to break RC2 x RC1, then break 2.1 x > 2.0. Agreed. > > But I would like to have some consensus there, so wait also for Steve > (at least). Let´s just keep in mind that the only service that uses sync is cpg. cpgbench / cpgverify they all seem to working fine. Fabio _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
