Re: Upcoming schedule for Needle 2.0.0 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As we are nearing the end of our Needle 2.0 development cycle, its time
> to start talking about release schedule.
>
> First some definitions:
> alpha: nearly feature complete, may be missing a few features and config
> format/ABI not completely stable, possible bugs.
>
> beta: feature complete, no missing features, stable ABI & config file
> format, possible bugs.
>
> release candidate: no new features allowed during development.  man page
> updates acceptable (and encouraged to bring our man pages up to date).
> Changes to C code not allowed except in the case of bug fixes.  Any
> stable ABI/API/config file format changes must be blockers.  Note
> changes will be allowed to any files in the cts directory even if they
> are not blockers.
>
> Release 2.0.0 (needle) - Our standard ABI guarantee, (X guarantees
> on-wire and API/ABI, Y may add new features or new APIs, Z are bug fixes
> only), no serious blocker bugs making the software unusable.
>
> blockers - The software is unusable for Pacemaker, GFS, QPID, Sheepdog,
> or has some major flaw which prevents its general usability by other
> projects.
>
> The schedule:
>
> Alpha           January 17, 2012        version 1.99.0
> Beta            January 31, 2012        version 1.99.1
> RC1             February 7, 2012        version 1.99.2
> RC2             February 14, 2012       version 1.99.3
> RC3             February 20, 2012       version 1.99.4
> RC4             February 27, 2012       version 1.99.5
> RC5             March 6, 2012           version 1.99.6
> Release 2.0.0   March 13, 2012          version 2.0.0
>
> Once 2.0.0 is released, support for the 1.3 series will cease.  Support
> for 1.4 series will continue for 3-5 years.

Does this tie into a specific RHEL version, such as, 1.4 will be
available for as long as RHEL 6 is around or isn't it linked to the OS
release cycle?

Regards,
Dan

>
> Every patch from alpha+ must be verified to pass make dist and make rpm
> by the submitting developer.
>
> Regards
> -steve
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



-- 
Dan Frincu
CCNA, RHCE
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux