On 01/11/2012 02:18 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > On 1/11/2012 10:15 PM, Steven Dake wrote: >> On 01/11/2012 02:13 PM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: >>> NACK. >>> >>> Applications that used to access objdb via confdb have already been >>> ported to icmap. >>> >> >> Which applications? >> >> They should be using qb_map api instead... > > does qb_map access internal corosync data? dlm_controld at least has > been ported to icmap since icmap was originally described as replacement > for confdb. > The external api is "cmap" from the lib directory. icmap is the internal implementation (in the exec directory). If your using the internal implementation of icmap in dlm, it wont be able to share data with the rest of corosync. Here is how a request flows through the system: app -> cmap -> exec -> icmap -> exec -> cmap -> app > Fabio > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
