Re: Multiple rings for redundancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/2011 07:03 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 10:44 AM, Max Williams wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> What is the current state of support for multiple rings? I’m curious as
>> there was mention of this not being stable a while back.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Max
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> Redundant ring is supported in the 1.4.z series by the community.
> Previous versions are unsupported.

And how many rings are supported? Only two, or is there another limit?

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
Need help with Pacemaker?
http://www.hastexo.com/now

> 
> Regards
> -steve
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux