Re: GFS2 DLM problem on NVMes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:32:13AM +0000, Eric H. Chang wrote:
> We��ve tested with different ��toss_secs�� as advised. When we
> configured it as 1000, we saw the ��send_repeat_remove�� log after
> 1000sec. We can test with other values on ��toss_secs��, but we think it
> would have the same problem potentially when freeing up the slab after
> the configured sec.

Do you see many of these messages?  Do gfs operations become stuck after
they appear?

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux